Abstract: Purpose of Review: In the last 15 years, there has been a burgeoning interest in moral injury, particularly among veterans and in high-risk occupational contexts. Estimates of exposure frequency to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) are high among veterans. Psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been posited as sufficient for treating moral injury, which is tacitly conceptualized as a form of trauma. Several psychotherapies have also been developed to treat moral injury, or specific aspects of the purported syndrome (e.g., guilt). We describe and critically review individual and group psychotherapies that are putatively designed to address moral injury. Recent Findings: There have been no randomized controlled trials using a primary endpoint of moral injury. Instead, investigators have chiefly argued that existing evidence-based therapies for PTSD are de facto appropriate for PMIE-exposed individuals. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to suggest a best-practice approach. Summary: There is still no consensus definition of moral injury, nor a widely used gold standard outcome measure, which has led to a body of research with significant validity issues. Clinical trials are needed that use clinically significant moral injury as an entry criterion, repeated assessments of moral injury symptoms, and the functional impact of those symptoms.