Abstract: Within the United States Armed Forces, support of families is seen as a service that is critical to the success of the military mission. Due to the armed forces being an all-volunteer force, families of all demographics need to be served, including families where a dependent has a disability. Policies and practices influence how these families experience their lives in the armed forces. When those policies and practices conflict, they are often interpreted through court cases. This study analyzed interviews with attorneys familiar with military and/or disability-related issues to describe how these policies and practices are being interpreted in relation to military families where a family member experiences a disability. Interviews and qualitative analyses were guided by ecological systems and intersectionality theories. Participant attorneys reported that these families are typically enrolled in the Exceptional Family Member Program. Findings suggest that while policies as written do not appear to be in conflict, the applications of policies based on discretionary authority and cultural norms do appear to cause distress for these families. Particular concerns identified include resolving service interruptions after relocation, mitigating career influences, and addressing issues of appropriate representation. Recommendations for research, policy and advocacy, and practice are identified.